Supreme law: corruption and bribery cases sentencing starting point from 5,000 yuan to 30,000

"Interpretation" of the crime of corruption and bribery sentencing standards to make provisions
This morning, the Supreme People's Court held a press conference on the Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in Criminal Cases of Corruption and Bribery (hereinafter referred to as "Interpretation"). Reporters on the scene was informed that the "interpretation" of the crime of corruption and bribery conviction and sentencing standards to make provisions, including the two crimes "the amount of larger" sentencing standards by the 1997 criminal law to determine the 5,000 yuan to 30,000 yuan, Other grades of sentencing standards to make the appropriate adjustments. The "Criminal Law Amendment (9)", which was passed in August last year and which was formally promulgated on November 1, made a major adjustment to the crime of embezzlement and bribery. The concept of "large amount", "huge amount" and "huge amount" Instead of the provisions of the specific amount involved in the past. The release of the "interpretation" is clear on the specific amount. "Interpretation" provides that the amount of corruption or bribery in more than 30,000 yuan less than 200,000 yuan, should be identified as "the amount of large." Corruption or bribery amount of more than 200,000 yuan less than 3 million yuan, and should be identified as "a huge amount." Corruption or bribery amount of more than 3 million yuan, should be identified as "the amount of special huge." Supreme Court of the two courted father Pei Xianding introduction, it should be noted that the amount of corruption and bribery sentenced to 30,000 yuan, does not mean that less than 30,000 yuan of corruption and bribery behavior can not be treated as a crime. According to the "interpretation", corruption and bribery more than 10,000 yuan less than 30,000 yuan, with other heavier circumstances, they should be held criminally responsible. The judicial interpretation from April 18 from the formal implementation.

117843000:2017-04-05 17:34:40